The U.S. Military Once Tried Building A “Gay Bomb” To Make Enemy Soldiers Attracted to Each Other!
Imagine a weapon designed not to kill, but to make enemy soldiers fall in love with each other. It sounds like something straight out of a strange sci-fi movie, right? But what if we told you that this idea wasn’t just the product of a wild conspiracy theory? Believe it or not, the U.S. military actually explored this concept as a legitimate plan. Known as the “gay bomb,” this proposal was investigated with the intention of disrupting enemy forces in a non-lethal way. Let’s have a closer look at the details.
The Gay Bomb Proposal’s Origins
Back in 1994, the U.S. Department of Defense was actively researching ways to weaken enemy morale without causing physical harm. At that time, the military was searching for alternatives to lethal warfare, leading them to explore psychological and behavioral weapons. This is where the concept of the gay bomb comes in.
Wright Laboratory, located in Ohio, was responsible for drafting this peculiar proposal. At the time, it was one of the key players in developing innovative weapons. The lab’s mission was to create tools that could cause chaos among enemy ranks without taking lives, making the gay bomb concept an intriguing possibility for them.
“One distasteful but non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behaviour.”
says the proposal from the Air Force’s Wright Laboratory in Dayton, Ohio.
The $7.5 Million Idea
The Wright Laboratory researchers developed a three-page proposal asking for $7.5 million to research and develop the gay bomb. Their idea was simple: create a cloud of gas filled with chemicals, such as pheromones or aphrodisiacs, that would make enemy soldiers sexually attracted to each other. By triggering homosexual behavior, they believed this would lead to a breakdown of enemy units.
“That contained a chemical that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistibly attractive to one another.”
Describing the cloud of gas released by the bomb.
The proposal was submitted in 2000 and later released to the public through a biological weapons watchdog group in Austin, Texas, called the Sunshine Project. The documents came through under a freedom of information request. They were part of a larger investigation into military experiments, and the gay bomb was listed under a category titled “Harassing, Annoying, and Bad Guy Identifying Chemicals.”
The Pentagon did not deny the proposal’s details and origin.
“The department of defence is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform.”
The Fallout and Public Reaction
Naturally, this idea faced a lot of skepticism from experts. Many scientists agree that sexual orientation and behavior cannot be influenced by chemicals in such a simple way.
“The idea that you could submit someone to some aerosol spray and change their sexual behavior is ludicrous.”
Aaron Belkin, director of the Michael Palm Center at the University of California.
Once these documents were released, they caused quite a stir. Media outlets and the public were both baffled and amused by the concept. The idea of a gay bomb became a popular topic of discussion, with many questioning the absurdity of military research into such outlandish proposals.
The Ig Nobel Prize Award
In the end, the researchers who worked on the gay bomb were given an Ig Nobel Prize, a parody award given to scientific achievements that make people laugh but also think. The award reflected how bizarre and amusing the idea was, even though it had serious military backing at one point.
Other Bizarre Military Proposals
In 2002, it was proposed to the National Academy of Sciences and it influenced a series of other, equally unusual chemical warfare ideas. I
The Sting Me/Attack Me Bomb
The gay bomb wasn’t the only strange idea that the military considered. Another proposal involved dropping chemicals on enemy forces to attract angry swarms of wasps. This “sting me/attack me” bomb was theorized to cause chaos by unleashing insect attacks on enemy troops.
Halitosis and Flatulence Bombs
Among the weirder ideas were bombs designed to give enemy soldiers bad breath or uncontrollable flatulence. One bomb, called “Who? Me?”, aimed to make soldiers simulate flatulence, hoping the foul smells would distract and demoralize enemy forces. However, the idea was scrapped when researchers realized that not everyone found the smell of flatulence offensive.
Why None of These Ideas Came to Fruition
Despite the creativity behind these ideas, none of them ever became reality. According to Captain Dan McSweeney of the Pentagon’s Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate, “none of the systems described in that [1994] proposal have been developed.” The U.S. military receives hundreds of such proposals each year, but most, like the gay bomb, never move beyond the research phase.
Conclusion
The gay bomb, along with other bizarre military proposals, shows just how far the military was willing to go to find non-lethal ways to disrupt enemy forces. While these ideas were never realized, they still raise important questions about the ethical boundaries of military research. The gay bomb awarded the Ig Nobel Prize, reminds us of the fine line between creative innovation and the limits of scientific exploration.
Also read,
