Texas Republicans drew a GOP-friendly map for the U.S. House as part of a high-stakes redistricting fight. On December 4, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned order allowing Texas to use the newly redrawn map for the 2026 midterms, effectively staying a lower-court ruling that had blocked the map. The decision comes amid a broader wave of partisan redistricting battles that have drawn in Democrats, minority voting-rights advocates, and national commentators, with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton hailing the ruling as a major victory for conservatives.
A three-judge panel earlier found the map likely unconstitutional because it discriminated against voters based on race, blocking its use in the near term. The Supreme Court’s action reverses that halt, at least for the 2026 elections, while litigation over race-based districting continues in the courts.
The majority explained that the lower court did not properly honor the presumption of legislative good faith and had inappropriately intervened in an active primary campaign, given the timing of the ruling. By staying the injunction, the Court signaled deference to the state’s redistricting efforts as the legal battle unfolds.
The decision could preserve districts that reduce minority voting opportunities, depending on how ongoing litigation and forthcoming rulings unfold. Analysts and advocates say the outcome hinges on later court decisions about race-based districting, voting rights, and how courts balance timely election administration with protections for minority voters.
Nationally, the case fits into a broader pattern of redistricting fights that could reshape power in the U.S. House, with Republican and Democratic officials alike watching carefully how courts handle timing, good-faith assumptions, and racial considerations in map-making.
Disclosure: We may earn a commission when you make a purchase through the ads.